As a litigator, Rachel uses her quick thinking skills in the courtroom to process and respond rapidly to events happening in real time. She’s also spent years honing her writing, focusing on clarity and the craft of distilling complex legal issues into articulate, persuasive briefs. She cares deeply about her clients and makes it her goal to understand what’s important to them so she can pursue the right strategy to meet their goals.

Rachel specializes in complex commercial litigation with an emphasis on patent litigation, trade secret litigation, state law business torts, and appellate level disputes. Rachel is a key team member involved in all elements of trial, including formulating strategy, preparing briefs and pleadings, handling discovery matters, engaging in oral arguments, managing trial issues, and examining witnesses at trial. Rachel has a technical background in Chemical Engineering, and has experience in a wide variety of fields, including chemical technologies, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, mechanical devices, and software.

As a co-chair of the firm’s appellate practice, Rachel is one of the firm’s appellate specialists. She is a former Federal Circuit law clerk, has handled dozens of appeals, and has argued before the Federal Circuit both as the appellant and the appellee. In addition, Rachel leverages her appellate experience by consulting on appellate cases throughout the firm, for other firms, and for her clients. She is often in charge of strategic planning at the trial level for a possible appeal. As a thought leader, Rachel writes extensively on current legal issues and is the author of a law review article on effective appellate advocacy before the Federal Circuit. This thoughtful and informative article has been re-published in a prestigious legal treatise on appellate advocacy and is assigned reading in law school classes on appellate advocacy.

Rachel is also an active pro bono volunteer. As a volunteer attorney for the Advocates for Human Rights, Rachel represents asylum seekers in their hearings before the Immigration Judges as well as in their appeals to the Immigration Board of Appeals and Federal Circuit Courts. In her pro bono representation, she successfully obtained a remand of her client’s immigration case from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and obtained his legal status in the United States. In another matter, her team obtained asylum for her client before the Immigration Judge, and they were honored as 2017 Attorneys of the Year by Minnesota Lawyer. Rachel also volunteers as a housing court pro bono attorney through Volunteer Lawyer's Network and a family court pro bono attorney through the Children's Law Center.

In her spare time, Rachel serves on a variety of nonprofit boards. She also runs, swims, bikes, and practices yoga.

Representative Cases

Representative Appellate Matters

VF Outdoor, LLC v. Cocona, Inc., No. 20-1534 (Fed. Cir.)

Kostuch v. General Mills Inc., No. 19-1549 (Minn. Ct. App.)

Novartis v. Breckenridge, No. 17-2173 (Fed. Cir.)

Ahmed v. Ahmed, No. 16-142 (6th Cir.)

Arrow Electronics v. Arrow Partnership, No. 17-1062 (10th Cir.)

TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, No. 16-341 (Sup. Ct.) – lead counsel for amici curiae

Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., No. 15-1189 (Sup. Ct.) – lead counsel for amicus curiae Plantronics, Inc.

Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc. v. The Toro Company, Nos. 16-2433, 16-2514 (Fed. Cir.)

Rembrandt Gaming Techs. v. Boyd Gaming Corp., Nos. 16-2002, 16-2249 (Fed. Cir.)

Millennium Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz Inc., Nos. 16-1010, 15-2066 (Fed. Cir.)

International Controls and Measurements Corp. v. Honeywell International Inc., No. 2015-1724 (Fed. Cir.)

August Tech. Corp. v. Camtek, Ltd., Nos. 15-1434 (Fed. Cir.)

Rudolph Technologies, Inc. v. Camtek, Ltd., No. 15-1418 (Fed. Cir.)

Stephenson v. Game Show Network, LLC, No. 15-1359 (Fed. Cir.)

Radio Systems Corporation v. Lalor, No. 15-1311 (Fed. Cir.)

Integrated Technology Corp. v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc., No. 14-1820 (Fed. Cir.)

Health Grades, Inc. v. MDx Medical, Inc., No. 15-1230 (Fed. Cir.)

Wright Manufacturing, Inc. v. The Toro Company, No. 14-1534 (Fed. Cir.)

Ferring B.V. v. Watson Labs., Inc., No. 14-1416 (Fed. Cir.)

Phil-Insul Corp. v. Reward Wall Systems, Inc., No. 14-1078 (Fed. Cir.)

Lamina Packaging Innovations v. ITC, No. 14-1013 (Fed. Cir.)

Sieben v. United States, No. 13-5091 (Fed. Cir.)

August Tech. Corp. v. Camtek, Ltd., Nos. 12-1681, 13-1023 (Fed. Cir.)

Integrated Tech. Corp. v. Rudolph Techs., Inc., Nos. 12-1593, 12-1618 (Fed. Cir.)

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., v. Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., and Medtronic Vascular, Inc., No. 12-1538 (Fed. Cir.)

Reese v. Verizon Cal., Inc., No. 12-1048 (Fed. Cir.)

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen Int’l Distrib., Nos. 11-1572, 12-1168, 12-1169 (Fed. Cir.)

AstraZeneca Pharms. LP v. Apotex Corp., Nos. 11-1182, 11-1183, 11-1184, 11-1185, 11-1186, 11-1187, 11-1188, 11-1189, 11-1190 (Fed. Cir.)

August Tech. Corp. v. Camtek, Ltd., No. 10-1458 (Fed. Cir.)

Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc., No. 09-1039 (Fed. Cir.)

Khan v. Mukasey, No. 07-3908 (8th Cir.)

Fargo Elecs. Inc. v. Iris, Ltd., No. 07-1523 (Fed. Cir.)

Manchak v. U.S. Ecology, Inc., No. 04-1341 (Fed. Cir.)

Phillips v. AWH Corp., No. 03-1269 (Fed. Cir.) – counsel for Amicus Association of Patent Law Firms in patent case before Federal Circuit

Representative Trial Matters

Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc. et al, No. 20-189 (D. Del.)

Arclin USA, LLC v. Vits Technology GMBH and Huber Engineered Woods, No. 20-01197 (N.D. Ga.)

Arclin USA, LLC v. Vits Technology GMBH, No. 20-222799 (Fulton Cty. Ga.)

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and H. Lundbeck A/S v. Unichem Laboratories Ltd, No. 19-1977 (D. Del.)

Niazi Licensing Corporation v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., No. 5096 (D. Minn.)

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: Rice, No. 27-JV-19-2729 (Minn. 4th Judicial District)

Willis Electric Co., Ltd. v. Polygroup Limited et al, No. 03443 (D. Minn.)

Kostuch v. General Mills Inc., No. 62-18-7417 (Minn. 2d Judicial District)

In the Matter of: Mejia, No. A 206-360-657 (Immigration Court)

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: Gouveia, No. 27-JV-FA-19-274 (Minn. 4th Judicial District)

Carlson Pet Products, Inc. v. North States Indus., Inc., No. 17-2529 (D. Minn.)

Rudolph Technologies, Inc. v. Camtek Ltd., No. 15-1246 (D. Minn.)

Camtek Ltd. v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc., No. 17-11127 (D. Mass.)

Rudolph Technologies, Inc. v. Camtek, Ltd., No. 11-3707 (D. Minn.)

In the Matter of: Andrade, No. A 208-680-827 (Immigration Court)

Ferring B.V. v. Actavis, Inc. et al, No. 15-4222 (D.N.J.)

Johns Manville v. Knauf, No. 15-531 (D. Colo.)

Recro Gainesville LLC v. Actavis Laboratories FL Inc., No. 14-1118 (D. Del.)

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: Davies, No. 27-JV-15-3478 (Minn. 4th Judicial District)

Otsuka v. Actavis Elizabeth, No. 14-7016 (D.N.J.)

Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Actavis, Inc. et al, No. 14-6102 (D.N.J.)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, No. 14-1043 (D. Del.)

In the Matter of: Cuatro-Orellana, No. A 202-076-925 (B.I.A.)

In the Matter of: Cuatro-Orellana, No. A 202-076-925 (Immigration Court)

Daravita Limited v. Actavis Laboratories, FL Inc., No. 14-1118 (D. Del.)

Horizon Pharma v. Actavis Laboratories, FL Inc., No. 13-5124 (D.N.J.)

Ferring B.V. v. Actavis, Inc. et al, No. 3:13-477 (D. Nev.)

G.D. Searle LLC et al v. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al, No. 2:13-121 (E.D. Va.)

Ferring B.V. v. Watson Labs., Inc., Nos. 3:11-481, 3:11-485, 3:11-853, 3:11-854, 2:12-1941 (D. Nev.)

In the Matter of: Khan, No. A 98-534-898 (Immigration Court)

Lamina Packaging Innovations v. Champagne Louis Roederer, No. 13-CV-00171 (E.D. Tex.)

Lamina Packaging Innovations v. Champagne Louis Roederer, No. 337-TA-874 (ITC)

W.L. Gore & Assocs. v. Medtronic, Inc., No. 2:10-441 (E.D. Va.)

August Tech. Corp. v. Camtek, Ltd., No. 05-1396 (D. Minn.)

AmTab Mfg. Corp. v. SICO Inc., No. 11 C 2692 (N.D. Ill.)

Integrated Tech. Corp. v. Rudolph Techs., Inc., No. 06-2182 (D. Ariz.)

ePlus Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc., No. 3:09-620 (E.D. Va.)

TriStar Metals Inc. v. Groomers Best, No. 4:10-508-Y (N.D. Tex.)

Kelora Sys., LLC v. Target Corp., No. C 11-1548 (N.D. Cal.)

Khan v. D.O.J., No. A 98-534-898 (B.I.A.)

Larson v. AluminArt, No. 4:2003-04244 (D.S.D.)

Anagram Int’l, Inc. v. Mayflower Distrib. Co., No. 07-1142 (D. Minn.)

Telluride Asset Management LLC v. Falkenstein, No. 27-CV-07-4832 (Minn. 4th Judicial District)

Education

University of Minnesota Law School
J.D., magna cum laude, Order of the Coif
Minnesota Law Review, Note and Comment Editor, Outstanding Note Award

University of Wisconsin – Madison
B.S. Chemical Engineering, Tau Beta Pi
Lightweight Rowing Team
President, Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society

Admissions

State of Minnesota
    Minnesota State Courts
Federal Courts
    United States Supreme Court
    Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
    Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
    Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
    Minnesota Federal Courts
    Colorado Federal Courts

Professional Affiliations

Hennepin County Bar Association
   Board Member, 2018-2019, 2020-present
Federal Bar Association
Federal Circuit Bar Association
   Amicus Committee, Vice-Chair, 2016-2020; Journal Committee, Chair, 2020-present
Minnesota Women Lawyers
MWL Master Lawyer
The Honorable Jimmie V. Reyna Intellectual Property American Inn of Court
    Co-Founder and President-Elect

Awards & Recognition

Selected by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) to the Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Practitioners, 2020 (“a former Federal Circuit law clerk with a sharp mind” who is “extremely engaged in the local IP community”)

Selected by Hennepin County Bar Association for the Excellence Award for Mentoring in the Profession Award, 2019-2020

Selected by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) to the Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Practitioners, 2019 (“The firm’s litigation practice is one of its best features and Rachel Hughey one of its best district court and Federal Circuit litigators – she co-chairs the appellate practice. Her commitment to clients sees her getting involved in all phases of a litigation.”)

Selected for inclusion in Minnesota Super Lawyers, 2019-2020

Selected by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) to the Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Practitioners, 2018 (“Rachel Hughey, for example, has been diligently boosting the set’s profile in the appellate space – an endeavour in which she has succeeded, judging by the increasing volume of appeal instructions arising out of cases handled elsewhere. The former Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit clerk is a rising star with all the ingredients for effective appellate advocacy at her fingertips.”)

Recognized by Minnesota Monthly magazine in its list of Best Lawyers, 2018-2020

Selected by Minnesota Lawyer as one of its Attorneys of the Year – Groups, 2017

Selected as a member of The Fellows of the American Bar Foundation, 2017

Selected by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) to the Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Practitioners, 2017 (“newly featured pharmaceuticals ace and ‘excellent appellate lawyer’ Rachel Hughey is a dexterous trial lawyer who delivers winning arguments with great lucidity”)

Recognized by The Best Lawyers in America, 2017-2020

Selected by Minneapolis St. Paul Business Journal as a 40 Under 40 honoree, 2016

Selected by Mpls.St.Paul Magazine for inclusion in The Top Women Lawyers in Minnesota, 2012-2020

Selected for inclusion in Minnesota Rising Stars, 2009-2018

Selected by Minnesota Lawyer as one of twenty-five Up & Coming Attorneys, 2008

Publications & Speaking

Best Practices in Virtual Proceedings, The Federal Lawyer (forthcoming Jan. 2021) (with Tara D. Elliott)

Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility for IP Attorneys – Know When to Say “No”, Midwest IP Institute (October 2, 2020) (with Sarah Lockner and Holley Horrell)

Courts, Corporations and Law Firms: A Discussion of Diversity Initiative Successes and Failures, Minneapolis, MN (September 29, 2020) (with Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, Hema Viswanathan, and Heather Kliebenstein)

A Checklist Approach to Successful Motion Practice, Motions to Compel: 10 Tips & Techniques for Getting What You Need Without Annoying the Judge, Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, MN (September 25, 2020) (with Nicole Moen)

Mastering the Art of Writing Persuasive Appellate Briefs: Practical Tips from Past Appellate Law Clerks, Strafford Live CLE Webinar (September 10, 2020) (with Ben Cooper)

The Dos and Don'ts of Virtual Hearings and Oral Arguments, FCBA Webinar (Aug. 14, 2020) (with Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, Tara Elliott, Kelly Farnan, and Jen Wu)

Virtual panel discussion of experiences and tips regarding virtual hearings, depositions, and trial, IP Inn of Court, Minneapolis, MN (June 16, 2020) (with Judge Hildy Bowbeer, Judge Peter Reyes, Judge Becky Thorson, and Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright)

Magistrate Judge Practice, 2020 Federal Circuit Bar Association Bench & Bar Conference (June 16, 2020) with Judge Hildy Bowbeer, Judge Jennifer L. Hall, Judge Kimberly Priest Johnson)

Top Ten Ethics Tips, IP Inn of Court, Minneapolis, MN (December 4, 2019)

Section 8, Waiver of Privilege, Attorney-Client Privilege Deskbook (MSBA 2d ed. 2019) (with Karen Beckman)

Venue Decisions and Trends Post-TC Heartland, The Federal Lawyer (November 2019) (with Ian McFarland)

Effective Appellate Advocacy before the Federal Circuit, Clear Law Institute (October 9, 2019) (with Tim Grimsrud)

Venue in Patent Cases after TC Heartland, Clear Law Institute (October 1, 2019) (with Ian McFarland)

On the Cutting Edge: Updates on Patent Law, Data Privacy and E-Commerce, Cleveland, OH (July 11, 2019)

Patent Litigation Update: Venue, Appeals, Estoppel Issues, and Managing Co-Pending District Court/IPR proceedings, AIPLA ECLC Summit 2019, Minneapolis, MN (June 11, 2019) (with David Swenson)

Leadership in the Profession, FCBA Podcast (April 15, 2019)

A Conversation with the Federal Circuit, FCBA Bench & Bar in Dialogue, Minneapolis, MN (April 2, 2019) (with Derek Vandenburgh, featuring Judge Prost, Judge Reyna, and Judge Stoll)

Venue Decisions and Trends Post-TC Heartland, MN CLE, Minneapolis, MN (March 28, 2019) (with Ian McFarland)

Some Judges Attempt to Remove Barriers to Junior Attorney Participation, 66 The Federal Lawyer 5 (March/April 2019)

Mastering the Art of Writing Persuasive Appellate Briefs: Practical Tips from Past Appellate Law Clerks, Clear Law Institute (February 28, 2019) (with Benjamin Cooper)

Section 8, Waiver of Privilege, Attorney-Client Privilege Deskbook (MSBA 1st ed. 2018) (with Karen Beckman)

Venue In Patent Cases In The Year Since The Supreme Court’s TC Heartland Decision, 65 The Federal Lawyer 21 (December 2018) (Zach Kachmer)

Hot Topics, Trends, & Updates: 3-Minute Case Summaries: What Every In-House Lawyer Needs to Know, Nashville, TN (November 8, 2018)

Venue Decisions and Trends Post-TC Heartland, 2018 Midwest IP Institute, Minneapolis, MN (September 27, 2018)

Mastering the Art of Writing Persuasive Appellate Briefs: Practical Tips from Past Appellate Law Clerks, Strafford Live CLE Webinar (September 13, 2018) (with Benjamin Cooper)

Exceptions to and Waiver of Privilege, Attorney-Client Privilege: What Every Attorney Needs to Know, Minneapolis, MN (with Rachhana T. Srey, Reena I. Desai, and Karen L. Beckman) (August 30, 2018)

3-Minute Case Summaries: What Every Patent Lawyer Needs to Know, Hot Topics, Trends, & Updates: Cybersecurity, Patent Litigation Decisions, and the Implications, Cleveland, OH (July 11, 2018)

District Court Practice: Developments and Challenges, 2018 Federal Circuit Bar Association Bench & Bar Conference, San Diego, CA (June 22, 2018) (with Sonal N. Mehta, Jim Sherwood, Victoria Maroulis, and Vaishali Udupa)

Oil States and the Future of Inter Partes Reviews, Mitchell Hamline Patent Law Symposium, St. Paul, MN (April 6, 2018) (with James Smith and Cyrus Morton)

3-Minute Case Summaries: What Every Patent Lawyer Needs to Know, Oil States, WesternGeco, and More CLE, Minneapolis, MN (February 15, 2018) (with Rachel Zimmerman Scobie)

Latest Update on USPTO Inter Partes Review Proceedings, The Federal Lawyer 48 (January/February 2018)

What In-House Counsel Should Know about PTO Post-Grant Proceedings, 2017 Midwest IP Institute, Minneapolis, MN (September 28, 2017) (with Brian Jarrells) PowerPoint

Navigating Post-Grant Proceedings: What Two Years Of Federal Circuit Decisions and the Supreme Court’s Cuozzo Decision Tell Us About Post-Grant Proceedings Before The PTAB, 64 The Federal Lawyer 1 (January 2017) (with Joseph W. Dubis) PDF of Article

New PTAB Rules, New Key Cases & Emerging Trends – Strategic Implications for PTAB Proceedings and Appeals, 2016 Midwest IP Institute, Minneapolis, MN (September 22-23, 2016) (with Andrew Lagatta) PowerPoint | Article

Mastering the Art of Writing Persuasive Appellate Briefs: Practical Tips from Past Appellate Law Clerks, Strafford Live CLE Webinar (September 7, 2016)

Diversity Matters, The Federal Lawyer 4 (May 2016)

Patent Infringement Investigations, I Feel Conflicted: Managing Potential Conflicts Issues Surrounding Noninfringement Investigations, Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, MN (April 26, 2016)

Exceptions To Prosecution History Estoppel Are Hardly A Dime A Dozen: An Analysis Of The Federal Circuit’s Application Of The Narrow Exceptions To Prosecution History Estoppel Twelve Years After Festo, 7 Cybaris Intellectual Property Law Rev. (William Mitchell College of Law) (2016) (with Linhda Nguyen)

Tips for PTAB Appeals Before the Federal Circuit, Atlanta, GA (February 22, 2016)

A Checklist Approach to Successful Motion Practice: Motions to Compel: 10 Tips & Techniques for Getting What You Need Without Annoying the Judge, Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, MN (December 9, 2015) (with Nicole Moen) PowerPoint | Article

IP CLE: Practice tips before the CAFC, Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, MN (November 10, 2015) (with the Honorable Jimmie V. Reyna, the Honorable Richard Linn, and Kevin Rhodes)

Computer & Technology Law Institute: ePlus v. Lawson Up Close: Software Patent Litigation, a Tale of Two Worlds, and Lessons for Handling Your Next “Tech IP” Litigation, Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, MN (October 29, 2015) (with Bruce McPheeters)

Panelist, Sharing of Judicial Experiences: Intellectual Property Rights, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (August 10, 2015)

How to Get to Federal Circuit Rule 36, IP Law360 and Appellate Law360 (July 29, 2015)

Intellectual Property Series: Effective Appellate Advocacy before the Federal Circuit, Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, MN (March 6, 2015) (with Tim Grimsrud)

Inter Partes Review CLE, Minneapolis, MN (October 1, 2014)

Mentoring and Sponsorship: The Difference Between Success and Failure, The Federal Lawyer 4 (July 2014)

3 Tips For Any Fed. Circ. Appeal, Law360 (August 23, 2013)

The 75 Keys to Winning Your Next Patent Case, Minneapolis, MN (July 18, 2013)

Federal Circuit Oral Argument Post-Panel Discussion, U.S. Federal District Courthouse, Denver CO (October 2, 2012)

Patent Damages: Are There No More "Rules of Thumb"?, 2012 Midwest IP Institute, Minneapolis, MN (September 20, 2012)

Age-Old ABCs of Writing Applied to the Law, The Federal Lawyer 59 (June 2012)

The Ultimate Guide to Your Next Federal Circuit Brief, Patent Enforcement and Defense 2012, Minneapolis, MN (May 11, 2012)

Patent Damages: Are There No More 'Rules of Thumb'?, Patent Enforcement and Defense 2012, Minneapolis, MN (May 11, 2012)

Annual Review of Developments in Business and Corporate Litigation, Chapter 20.13 Federal Circuit Decisions, ABA Business Law Section (2011) (with William Burgess)

Assessing Reasonable Royalty Damages for Patent Infringement in a Changing Legal Landscape, The IP Legal Browser (Winter 2011)

Effective Appellate Advocacy Before The Federal Circuit: A Former Law Clerk's Perspective, 11 J. of Appellate Prac. and Pro. 401 (2010)

Evaluating Reasonable Royalties After ResQNet, IP Law360 (October 14, 2010) (with Phil Green)

Supersize Me: Damages Claims in Patent Litigation, Patent Enforcement and Defense 2010 CLE, Minneapolis, MN (April 28, 2010)

Annual Review of Developments in Business and Corporate Litigation, ABA Business Law Section (2010)

Avoiding Patent Claim Construction Errors After Phillips, The Federal Lawyer 50 (November 2009) (with Anthony R. Zeuli)

The Three Year Anniversary of eBay v. MercExchange: A Statistical Analysis of Permanent Injunctions, IP Today 25 (November 2009) (with Ernest Grumbles and Susan Perera)

Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.: The Federal Circuit Finally Aligns Its Precedent On Product-By-Process Claims, IP Today 1 (November 2009)

Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.: Heightened Pleading Standard for Inequitable Conduct, IP Law360 (September 2009)

First–Sale Doctrine – Absolute or Conditional Under Quanta v. LG Electronics?, American Intellectual Property Law Association, Miami, FL (January 28, 2009)

A Review of the Supreme Court's Decision in Quanta v LG Electronics, Minnesota Intellectual Property Law Association, Minneapolis, MN (June 26, 2008)

First–sale doctrine: absolute or conditional?, Minn. Lawyer In–House Counsel Q. (June 12, 2008)

Avoiding Claim Construction Errors by Determining the Ordinary and Customary Meaning, Advanced Patent Litigation Seminar, American Intellectual Property Law Association, New York City, NY (June 24, 2005)

R.F. Delaware, Inc. v. Pacific Keystone Technologies, Inc.: The Federal Circuit Has Finally Spoken on Collateral Estoppel of Claim Interpretation, 20 Santa Clara Computer and High Tech. L. J. 293 (2004)

The District of Columbia's Decision in Pro–Football v. Harjo and Its Effect on Trademark Protection of Other Marks, 14 Fordham Intellectual Prop., Media & Entertainment L. J. 327 (2004)

Avoiding Patent Claim Construction Errors: Determining the Ordinary and Customary Meaning Before Reading the Written Description, The Federal Lawyer 29 (June 2004) (with Tony Zeuli)

Implied Licenses by Legal Estoppel, 14 Albany Law J. Sci. & Tech. 53 (2003)

Trademark Protection for Native American Team Names and Mascots and the Impact of the Harjo Decision, XVI Sovereignty Symposium 81 (2003)

Collateral Estoppel of Claim Interpretation After Markman, 86 Minn. L. Rev. 1581 (2002)

Teaching

University of Minnesota Law School, Legal Writing Instructor, 2003-2005, 2006-2007

University of Minnesota Law School, Intellectual Property Moot Court Instructor, 2003-2005, 2006-2007

University of St. Thomas, Communications Law Instructor, 2004-2005

Board Service

Law360 Intellectual Property Editorial Advisory Board, 2020

ACLU-MN, Board Member, 2017-present

Hennepin County Bar Association, Board Member, 2018-2019. 2020-present

Minnesota Law Review Alumni Advisory Board, Board Member, 2010-2015; President, 2011-2015

The Federal Bar Association, Editorial Board for The Federal Lawyer, 2011-present; Editor-in-Chief, 2018-2019

Federal Circuit Bar Association, Amicus Committee, Vice-Chair, 2016-present

The American Intellectual Property Law Association, Editorial Board for the AIPLA Quarterly Journal, 2011-2014

University of Minnesota Law School Board of Advisors, Board Member, 2014-2020; Executive Committee, 2017-2020

Volunteer Lawyers Network, Board Member, 2013-present, Executive Committee, 2017-present; Board Chair 2019-2020

YouthCARE, Alumni Advisory Board Member, 2013-2019

YouthCARE, Board Member, 2010-2012