Skip to Main Content
Jeffrey D. Blake photo

Jeff Blake is a partner in Merchant's Atlanta office and serves as co-chair of the firm's Litigation Practice Group. His practice involves all aspects of intellectual property litigation and counseling, including patent disputes in the electrical, software, pharmaceutical, and consumer-technology fields. His experience includes district court litigation, U.S. International Trade Commission investigations, inter partes review (IPR) and ex parte reexamination (EPR) proceedings, and appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Jeff brings value to his clients by studying every aspect of the client’s business so that he can focus his representation on issues that matter. He develops practical strategies around the client's commercial goals and works closely with in-house teams throughout the life of a dispute. This allows Jeff to both identify opportunities to monetize a client’s intellectual property assets and successfully defend a client accused of infringing another’s intellectual property.

An experienced trial attorney, Jeff has represented electronics and consumer-technology companies in patent infringement litigation involving semiconductor circuitry, microprocessor hardware and software, network security, televisions and telephony, automotive software, engine ignition systems, commercial wire and cable products, homebuilding products, and near-field communication technology. He has also represented major pharmaceutical companies in numerous litigations brought under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. His work has spanned district court and appellate litigation, Section 337 investigations before the U.S. International Trade Commission, and post-grant practice before the USPTO.

In addition, Jeff has litigated copyright infringement and unfair-competition actions, negotiated patent-portfolio licenses, advised on product clearance, and handled disputes involving misuse of internet domain names under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. Jeff also represents clients pro bono through the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers Foundation and is the immediate past Chairman of the Board of Trustees for the non-profit Atlanta Center for Puppetry Arts.

Maxell, Ltd. v. Coretronic Corp. (Eastern District of Texas) – Representing manufacturer of projector products in patent litigation relating to optical projector technology.

Huber Engineered Woods LLC v. i4F Licensing, N.V. (Western District of North Carolina) – Representing manufacturer of engineered wood products in declaratory judgment patent litigation against patent licensing company relating to flooring products.

CMP Development LL...

  • University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 2000
  • University of Alabama, 1997
  • Georgia State Bar, 2008
  • New York State Bar, 2001
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 2006
  • U.S. District Court for the Middle District, 2008
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2004
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District, 2003
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District, 2003
  • Co-Chair, Merchant Litigation Practice Group (effective November 1, 2023)
  • American Bar Association Patent Litigation Committee
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association
  • Federal Circuit Bar Association
  • State Bar of Georgia, Intellectual Property section
  • Corporate Intellectual Property Institute, Atlanta, GA – Vice Chair
  • Selected for inclusion in Georgia Super Lawyers (2016-2024)
  • Selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America (2019-2027)
  • Selected for inclusion in IP Stars by Managing IP (2013-2021, 2025-2026)
  • Moderator, IP Litigation Strategies: TC Heartland, Halo and the New Federal Rules, Atlanta Bar Association IP SpringPosium (April 28, 2017)
  • Speaker and Moderator, What’s Your Opinion? The Landscape of Willful Infringement After Halo, Merchant & Gould CLE – Strategies & Best Practices for Corporate IP Counsel: The Big Picture (March 6, 2017)
  • Moderator, Strategic Considerations in Inter Partes Review, GSU Corporate Intellectual Property Institute (October 25, 2016)
  • Speaker, Section 101: Rule 12(b)(6) and Other Defensive Strategies, Tennessee Intellectual Property Law Association – Fall Seminar (November 13, 2015)
  • Moderator, Managing an IP Budget in Small and Big Companies, GSU Corporate Intellectual Property Institute (October 27, 2015)
  • Moderator, Inter Partes Review; Strategies for Success, Atlanta Bar Association IP SpringPosium (April 10, 2015)
  • Moderator, Analyzing the Patent Dispute Options – The Courts vs. The PTO, GSU Corporate Intellectual Property Institute (October 27, 2014)
  • Moderator, Patent Ethics Issues Facing In-House Counsel, GSU Corporate Intellectual Property Institute (November 4, 2013)

Authored/Featured

  • “Inter Partes Review (IPR): The New Frontier of AI Tools,” The Patent Lawyer, Issue 76 (2025)
  • “CAFC Affirms Noninfringement of Apparatus Claim with Ordered Functional Limitations,” IP Case Updates Blog (October 28, 2025).
  • “Federal Circuit Tightens Standards for Trade Secret Preliminary Injunctions,” IP Case Updates Blog (June 25, 2024).
  • “Federal Circuit Affirms Patent Indefiniteness Ruling,” IP Case Updates Blog (October 10, 2023)

Quoted

  • How the Fidget Spinner Origin Story Spun Out of Control, Bloomberg Technology (May 11, 2017)
  • Decision Could Make It Difficult to Hold Executives Liable for Inducing Infringement, Inside Counsel (March 26, 2013)